Be my guest! Challenges and practical solutions of undertaking interviews with children in the home setting.
Coad, J., Gibson, F., Horstman, M., Milnes, L., Randall, D., & Carter, B. (2015). Be my guest! Challenges and practical solutions of undertaking interviews with children in the home setting. Journal of Child Health Care, 19(4), pp. 432-443
The ‘other participant’ in the room: The effect of significant adults in research with children.
Pyer, M., & Campbell, J. (2013). The ‘other participant’ in the room: The effect of significant adults in research with children. Research Ethics, 9(4), pp. 153-165.
Research with, by, for and about children: Lessons from disaster contexts.
Gibbs, L., Mutch, C., O’Connor, P., & MacDougall, C. (2013). Research with, by, for and about children: Lessons from disaster contexts. Global Studies of Childhood, 3(2), pp. 129-141.
Interrupting life history: The evolution of relationship within research.
Hallett, R. E. (2013). Interrupting life history: The evolution of relationship within research. Qualitative Report, 18(27).
‘Stepping back’ as researchers: Addressing ethics in arts-based approaches to working with war-affected children in school and community settings.
Akesson, B., D’Amico, M., Denov, M., Khan, F., Linds, W., & Mitchell, C. (2014). ‘Stepping back’ as researchers: Addressing ethics in arts-based approaches to working with war-affected children in school and community settings. Educational Research for Social Change, 3(1), pp. 75-89.
Digital technologies for supporting the informed consent of children and young people in research: The potential for transforming current research ethics practice.
Parsons, S., & Abbott, C. (2013). Digital technologies for supporting the informed consent of children and young people in research: The potential for transforming current research ethics practice. UK: EPSRC Observatory for Responsible Innovation in ICT.
Children as research subjects: A risky enterprise.
Hood, S., Kelley, P., & Mayall, B. (1996). Children as research subjects: A risky enterprise. Children & Society, 10(2), pp. 117 – 128.
Who says yes? Collective and individual framing of Pacific children’s consent to, and participation in, research in New Zealand.
Suaalii, T. M., & Mavoa, H. (2003). Who says yes? Collective and individual framing of Pacific children’s consent to, and participation in, research in New Zealand. Pacific Health Dialogue, 10(2), pp. 193-197.
Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology and ‘spaces of points of view’: Whose reflexivity, which perspective?
Kenway, J., & McLeod, J. (2004). Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology and ‘spaces of points of view’: Whose reflexivity, which perspective? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), pp. 525-544.
Professional researcher or a ‘good guest’? Ethical dilemmas involved in researching children and families in the home setting.
Yee, W. C., & Andrews, J. (2006). Professional researcher or a ‘good guest’? Ethical dilemmas involved in researching children and families in the home setting. Educational Review, 58(4), pp. 397-413.