Asking ethical questions in research using immersive virtual and augmented reality technologies with children and youth.
Southgate, E., Smith, S. P., & Scevak, J. (2017). Asking ethical questions in research using immersive virtual and augmented reality technologies with children and youth. Los Angeles: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE Xplore)
Challenges in gaining and re-gaining informed consent among young people on the margins of education.
Aaltonen, S. (2017). Challenges in gaining and re-gaining informed consent among young people on the margins of education. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(4), pp. 329-341.
Anonymity, confidentiality and informed consent: Exploring ethical quandaries and dilemmas in research with and about disabled children’s childhoods.
Thackray, L. (2018). Anonymity, confidentiality and informed consent: Exploring ethical quandaries and dilemmas in research with and about disabled children’s childhoods. In T. Curran & K. Liddiard (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies (pp. 299-313). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Justifying children and young people’s involvement in social research: Assessing harm and benefit.
Kennan, D., & Dolan, P. (2017). Justifying children and young people’s involvement in social research: Assessing harm and benefit. Irish Journal of Sociology, 25(3), pp. 297-314.
Assent for children’s participation in research: Why it matters and making it meaningful.
Oulton, K., Gibson, F., Sell, D., Williams, A., Pratt, L., & Wray, J. (2016). Assent for children’s participation in research: Why it matters and making it meaningful. Child: Care, Health and Development, 42(4), pp. 588-597.
The family context of assent: Comparison of child and parent perspectives on familial decision-making.
Sibley, A., Fitzpatrick, R., Davis, E., Sheehan, M., & Pollard, A. J. (2018). The family context of assent: Comparison of child and parent perspectives on familial decision-making. Children & Society, 32(4), pp.266-278.
Drawing the line at age 14: Why adolescents should be able to consent to participation in research.
Schwartz, R. (2017). Drawing the line at age 14: Why adolescents should be able to consent to participation in research. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 45(3), pp. 295-306.
Who wants to participate in routine outcome monitoring? Differences between youth in secured residential care who consent or refuse the use of their clinical data for research and policy making.
Nijhof, K. S., van Domburgh, L., Strijbosch, E., Labun, A., Delsing, M., Scholte, R. H. J., & Vermaes, I. P. R. (2017). Who wants to participate in routine outcome monitoring? Differences between youth in secured residential care who consent or refuse the use of their clinical data for research and policy making. Residential Treatment for […]
(Co)-Researching with children.
Fleet, A., & Harcourt, D. (2018). (Co)-Researching with children. In M. Fleer & B. van Oers (Eds.), International Handbook of Early Childhood Education (pp. 165-201). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. ISBN: 978-94-024-0925-3
“Telling” and assent: Parents’ attitudes towards children’s participation in a birth cohort study.
Ri, I., Suda, E., Yamagata, Z., Nitta, H., & Muto, K. (2018). “Telling” and assent: Parents’ attitudes towards children’s participation in a birth cohort study. Health Expectations, 21(1), pp. 358-366.