Insiders’ perspectives: A children’s rights approach to involving children in advising on adult-initiated research.
Dunn, J. (2015). Insiders’ perspectives: A children’s rights approach to involving children in advising on adult-initiated research. International Journal of Early Years Education, 23(4), pp. 394-408.
The inclusion of open-ended questions on quantitative studies of children: Dealing with unanticipated responses relating to child abuse and neglect.
Lloyd, K., & Devine, P. (2015). The inclusion of open-ended questions on quantitative surveys of children: Dealing with unanticipated responses relating to child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect, 48, pp. 200-207.
Young people’s perspectives on participatory ethics: Agency, power and impact in domestic abuse research and policy-making.
Houghton, C. (2015). Young people’s perspectives on participatory ethics: Agency, power and impact in domestic abuse research and policy-making. Child Abuse Review, 24(4), pp. 235-248.
‘Don’t make us talk!’: Listening to and learning from children and young people living with parental alcohol problems.
Hill, L. (2015). ‘Don’t make us talk!’: Listening to and learning from children and young people living with parental alcohol problems. Children & Society, 29(5), pp. 344-354.
Informed consent with children and young people in social research: Is there scope for innovation?
Parsons, S., Sherwood, G., & Abbott, C. (2016). Informed consent with children and young people in social research: Is there scope for innovation? Children & Society, 30(2), pp. 132-145.
High risk yet invisible: Conflicting narratives on social research involving children and young people, and the role of research ethics committees.
Parsons, S., Abbott, C., McKnight, L., & Davies, C. (2015). High risk yet invisible: Conflicting narratives on social research involving children and young people, and the role of research ethics committees. British Educational Research Journal, 41(4), pp. 709-729.
Non-therapeutic research with minors: How do chairpersons of German research ethics committees decide?
Lenk, C., Radenbach, K., Dahl, M., & Wiesemann, C. (2004). Non-therapeutic research with minors: How do chairpersons of German research ethics committees decide? Journal of Medical Ethics, 30(1), pp. 85-87.
Doing more good than harm? The effects of participation in sex research on young people in The Netherlands.
Kuyper, L., de Wit, J., Adam, P., & Woertman, L. (2012). Doing more good than harm? The effects of participation in sex research on young people in The Netherlands. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(2), pp. 497-506.
Engaging with children as co-researchers: Challenges, counter-challenges and solutions.
Bradbury-Jones, C., & Taylor, J. (2015). Engaging with children as co-researchers: Challenges, counter-challenges and solutions. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(2), pp. 161-173.
Survival of the fastest: Ethical dilemmas in research with ‘boy racers’.
Lumsden, K. (2013). Survival of the fastest: Ethical dilemmas in research with ‘boy racers’. Young, 21(3), pp. 273-288.