Getting past the gatekeeper: Safeguarding and access issues in researching HIV+ children in Jamaica.
Miller, P., Kelly, K., & Spawls, N. (2013). Getting past the gatekeeper: Safeguarding and access issues in researching HIV+ children in Jamaica. Policy Futures in Education, 11(2), pp. 167-174.
How an exchange of perspectives led to tentative ethical guidelines for visual ethnography.
Pope, C. C., De Luca, R., & Tolich, M. (2010). How an exchange of perspectives led to tentative ethical guidelines for visual ethnography. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 33(3), pp. 301-315.
Ethical and epistemological insights: A case study of participatory action research with young people.
Chabot, C., Shoveller, J. A., Spencer, G., & Johnson, J. L. (2012). Ethical and epistemological insights: A case study of participatory action research with young people. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(2), pp. 20-33.
Recognition as a framework for ethical participatory research: Developing a methodology with looked after young people.
Hooper, C.-A., & Gunn, R. (2014). Recognition as a framework for ethical participatory research: Developing a methodology with looked after young people. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(5), pp. 475-488.
Ethical beginnings: Reflexive questioning in designing child sexuality research.
Flanagan, P. (2014). Ethical beginnings: Reflexive questioning in designing child sexuality research. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 14(2), pp. 139-146.
Children exposed to domestic violence: A discussion about research ethics and researchers’ responsibilities.
Cater, Å., & Øverlien, C. (2014). Children exposed to domestic violence: A discussion about research ethics and researchers’ responsibilities. Nordic Social Work Research, 4(1), pp. 67-79.
Students in distress: Unanticipated findings in a cyber bullying study.
Mishna, F., Schwan, K. J., Lefebvre, R., Bhole, P., & Johnston, D. (2014). Students in distress: Unanticipated findings in a cyber bullying study. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, pp. 341-348.
Who benefits? A critical reflection of children and young people’s participation in sensitive research.
McCarry, M. (2012). Who benefits? A critical reflection of children and young people’s participation in sensitive research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15(1), pp. 55-68.
Assessment of children’s capacity to consent for research: A descriptive qualitative study of researchers’ practices.
Gibson, B. E., Stasiulis, E., Gutfreund, S., McDonald, M., & Dade, L. (2011). Assessment of children’s capacity to consent for research: A descriptive qualitative study of researchers’ practices. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(8), pp. 504-509.
Balancing autonomy rights and protection: Children’s involvement in a child safety online project.
Ost, S. (2013). Balancing autonomy rights and protection: Children’s involvement in a child safety online project. Children & Society, 27(3), pp. 208-219.