To stop or not to stop: Dissent and undue burden as reasons to stop participation in paediatric research.
Bos, W., Westra, A., de Beaufort, I., & van de Vathorst, S. (2017). To stop or not to stop: Dissent and undue burden as reasons to stop participation in paediatric research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 43(8), pp. 519-523.
Brown, H. R., Harvey, E. A., Griffith, S. F., Arnold, D. H., & Halgin, R. P. (2017). Assent and dissent: Ethical considerations in research with toddlers. Ethics & Behavior, Published on-line ahead of print.
Bruzzese, J.-M., & Fisher, C. B. (2003). Assessing and enhancing the research consent capacity of children and youth. Applied Developmental Science, 7(1), pp. 13-26.
Using interactive nonfiction narrative to enhance competence in the informed consent process with 3-year-old children.
Mayne, F., Howitt, C., & Rennie, L. J. (2017). Using interactive nonfiction narrative to enhance competence in the informed consent process with 3-year-old children. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(3), pp. 299-315.
Khoja, N. (2016). Situating children's voices: Considering the context when conducting research with young children. Children & Society, 30(4), pp. 314-323.
Waligora, M., Różyńska, J., & Piasecki, J. (2016). Child’s objection to non-beneficial research: Capacity and distress based models. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 19(1), pp. 65-70.
Dockett, S., Einarsdóttir, J., & Perry, B. (2012). Young children's decisions about research participation: Opting out. International Journal of Early Years Education, 20(3). pp. 244-256.
Bourke, R. & Loveridge, J. (2014). Exploring informed consent and dissent through children's participation in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 37(2). pp. 151-165.