Berman, G., & Albright, K. (2017). Children and the data cycle: Rights and ethics in a big data world. Innocenti Working Paper 2017/05 Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.
Read More
Children and the data cycle: Rights and ethics in a big data world.
Ethical considerations when using social media for evidence generation.
Berman, G., Powell, J., & Herranz, M. G. (2018). Ethical considerations when using social media for evidence generation. Innocenti Discussion Paper 2018-01. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research – Innocenti.
Read More
Editorial: Forgotten no more: How policy guideline changes are bringing newborns, infants, and children to the forefront of drug discovery and testing.
Maron, J. L. (2017). Editorial: Forgotten no more: How policy guideline changes are bringing newborns, infants, and children to the forefront of drug discovery and testing. Clinical Therapeutics, 39(10), pp. 1918-1919.
Editorial: Ethics committees, journal publication and research with children.
Robson, E. (2017). Editorial: Ethics committees, journal publication and research with children. Children’s Geographies, Published on-line ahead of print, 1-8.
Guidance for developing ethical research projects involving children.
Department of Child and Youth Affairs. (2012). Guidance for developing ethical research projects involving children. Dublin: Irish Government.
Read More
The importance of confidentiality: Research and promises of confidentiality to children: A legal commentary.
Parkinson, P., & Cashmore, J. (2012). The importance of confidentiality: Research and promises of confidentiality to children: A legal commentary. Ethics 1: Good Research Practice: A brief history of ethics and its implications. On-line: Epigeum Ltd.
Extract from Introduction: The following commentary deals with a legal challenge by Patrick Parkinson, Professor of Law, and Judy Cashmore, Research Psychologist, University of Sydney, in 2002. A decision of the Family Court of Australia indicated that research conducted with children under express promises of confidentiality may be protected from subpoena (a court order to produce the data). The case (T v. L, unreported, 12.10.2001, Collier J, Parramatta) arose from research we conducted on children’s participation in making decisions about residence and contact following their parents’ separation. Parents and children were interviewed only after proceedings were thought to be completed. They were all given express, explicit undertakings of confidentiality, orally and in papers mailed to families by the Family Court of Australia inviting them to contact us.
Open Access
