Image Alt

THE ERIC LIBRARY

Taplin, S., Chalmers, J., Brown, J., Moore, T., Graham, A., & McArthur, M. (2021). Human Research Ethics Committee experiences and views about children’s participation in research: Results from the MESSI study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, Published

Mayes, E. (2019). The mis/uses of ‘voice’ in (post)qualitative research with children and young people: Histories, politics and ethics. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(10), pp. 1191-1209. Abstract: This article extends recent attempts to think (post)qualitative research together with

Moran-Ellis, J. & Tisdall, E.K.M. (2019). The relevance of ‘competence’ for enhancing or limiting children’s participation: Unpicking conceptual confusion. Global Studies of Childhood, Published on-line ahead of print. Please view the abstract for this article via the Publisher's Link below.

Malatest International. (2021). Ethical considerations in social research with children and young people. Wellington New Zealand. Abstract: Including young people’s voices in social research informs our understanding of how to deliver services and develop policies to improve young people’s wellbeing. However,

Molestone, R., Wiebesiek, L., Treffry-Goatley, A., & Mandrona, A. (Eds.). (2021). Ethical Practice in Participatory Visual Research with Girls. New York: Berghahn Books. ISBN 978-1-80073-033-5 eISBN 978-1-80073-034-2 Book Description: Girls and young women, particularly those from rural and indigenous communities around the

Rutanen, N., de Souza Amorim, K., Marwick, H., & White, J. (2018). Tensions and challenges concerning ethics on video research with young children - Experiences from an international collaboration among seven countries. Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(1), pp.

Woolhouse, C. (2019). Conducting photo methodologies with children: Framing ethical concerns relating to representation, voice and data analysis when exploring educational inclusion with children. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(1), pp. 3-18. This article offers a critical discussion