Who says yes? Collective and individual framing of Pacific children’s consent to, and participation in, research in New Zealand.
Suaalii, T. M., & Mavoa, H. (2003). Who says yes? Collective and individual framing of Pacific children’s consent to, and participation in, research in New Zealand. Pacific Health Dialogue, 10(2), pp. 193-197.
Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology and ‘spaces of points of view’: Whose reflexivity, which perspective?
Kenway, J., & McLeod, J. (2004). Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology and ‘spaces of points of view’: Whose reflexivity, which perspective? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), pp. 525-544.
Professional researcher or a ‘good guest’? Ethical dilemmas involved in researching children and families in the home setting.
Yee, W. C., & Andrews, J. (2006). Professional researcher or a ‘good guest’? Ethical dilemmas involved in researching children and families in the home setting. Educational Review, 58(4), pp. 397-413.
Ethical issues surrounding studies with vulnerable populations: A case study of South African street children.
Richter, M. S., Groft, J. N., & Prinsloo, L. (2007). Ethical issues surrounding studies with vulnerable populations: A case study of South African street children. International Journal of Adolescent Medical Health, 19(2), pp. 117-126.
`Becoming participant’: Problematizing `informed consent’ in participatory research with young people in care.
Renold, E., Holland, S., Ross, N. J., & Hillman, A. (2008). `Becoming participant’: Problematizing `informed consent’ in participatory research with young people in care. Qualitative Social Work, 7(4), pp. 427-447.
Unique ethical complexities and empowering youth in the research process.
Trussell, D. (2008). Unique ethical complexities and empowering youth in the research process. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 26(2), pp. 163-176.
Researching street-frequenting young people in Suva: Ethical considerations and their impacts.
Vakaoti, P. (2009). Researching street-frequenting young people in Suva: Ethical considerations and their impacts. Children’s Geographies, 7(4), pp. 435-450.
‘Going deep’ and ‘giving back’: Strategies for exceeding ethical expectations when researching amongst vulnerable youth.
Swartz, S. (2011). ‘Going deep’ and ‘giving back’: Strategies for exceeding ethical expectations when researching amongst vulnerable youth. Qualitative Research, 11(1), pp. 47-68.
Ethical mindfulness and reflexivity: Managing a research relationship with children and young people in a 14-year qualitative longitudinal research (QLR) study.
Warin, J. (2011). Ethical mindfulness and reflexivity: Managing a research relationship with children and young people in a 14-year qualitative longitudinal research (QLR) study. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(9), pp. 805-814.
What we say and what we do: Reflexivity, emotions and power in children and young people’s participation.
Kina, V. J. (2012). What we say and what we do: Reflexivity, emotions and power in children and young people’s participation. Children’s Geographies, 10(2), pp. 201-218.